Peran Lie Kim Hok (1853-1912)  Dalam Membangkitkan Agama Khonghucu Di Indonesia Era 1900-An

Dwi Susanto

doi:10.31291/jlka.v18i1.546

Authors

Dwi Susanto Universitas Sebelas Maret

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31291/jlka.v18i1.546

Keywords:

Khong Hucu, peranakan Tionghoa, dan Lie Kim Hok

Abstract

The role of Lie Kim Hok in spreading Confucianism is not only seen from involvement in cultural organizations, but it is seen from the literary works. The research is to discussing the thoughts and contents of Lie Kim Hok's work. This research shown the social practices carried out by Lie Kim Hok in promoting Confucians. This paper uses the concept of structural duality from Anthony Giddens. The results achieved were, Lie Kim Hok gave a response to the social structure of the Chinese peranakan community, especially through the Confucian religious movement. Secondly, Lie Kim Hok's ideas and actions were responded to by the emergence of various religious movements through the writing of religious and educational work by other intellectuals. Third, the social practice was further a response to the colonial discourse so that the movement returned to Confucianism was not only a religious movement, but an attempt at cultural nationalism. This cultural nationalism was further part of the colonial resistance movement. Therefore, Lie Kim Hok is basically resistant to colonial discourse.

Key words: Confucius, Chinese descendant, Lie Kim Hok

Peran Lie Kim Hok dalam menyebarkan agama Khonghucu tidak hanya terlihat dari keterlibatan dalam organisasi kultural, tetapi hal itu terlihat dari karya yang dihasilkan. Penelitian yang telah dilakukan belum menunjukkan praktik sosial yang dilakukan Lie Kim Hok dalam mempromosikan Khonghucu. Tulisan yang ada membicarakan pemikiran dan isi karya dari Lie Kim Hok. Tulisan ini menggunakan konsep dualitas struktur dari Anthony Giddens. Hasil yang dicapai adalah, pertama, Lie Kim Hok memberikan respon pada struktur sosial di kalangan masyarakat peranakan Cina, khususnya melalui gerakan agama Khonghucu. Kedua, gagasan dan tindakan Lie Kim Hok itu direspon dengan kemunculan berbagai gerakan keagamaan melalui penulisan karya keagamaan dan pendidikan oleh para intelektual yang lain. Ketiga, praktik sosial tersebut lebih lanjut merupakan sebuah respon atas wacana kolonial sehingga gerakan kembali pada ajaran agama Khonghucu itu bukan hanya sebagai gerakan kegamaan, melainkan sebagai upaya nasionalisme kebudayaan. Nasionalisme kebudayaan ini lebih lanjut adalah bagian dari gerakan resistensi kolonial. Dengan demikian, Lie Kim Hok pada dasarnya bersifat resisten terhadap wacana kolonial.

Kata kunci: Khonghucu, peranakan Tionghoa, Lie Kim Hok

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Buku
Gernet, Jaques. A History of Chinese Civilization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Giddens, Anthony. The Constitutions of Society, Teori Struktura¬si Untuk Analisis Sosial. Edited by Ahmad Taufiq A. Rahman. Translated. Yogyakarta: Toko Print, 2011.
Kartodirjo, Sartono. Pengantar Sejarah Indonesia Baru: Sejarah Pergerakan Nasional Dari Kolonialisme Sampai Nasiona-lis¬me Jilid 2. Jakarta: Gramedia, 1990.
Kwee, John B. Chinese Malay Literatureof Peranakan Chinese in Indonesia 1880-1942. University Auckland, 1977.
Lev, Daniel S. “Politik Minoritas, Minoritas Dalam Politik,” dalam Seminar Orang Tionghoa-Indonesia: Manusia Dan Kebu¬da¬yaan¬nya. Jakarta: YMI dan LIPI, 2000.
Loomba, Ania. Kolonialisme/Pascakolonialisme. Edited by Harto¬no Hadikusumo. Translated. Yogyakarta: Bentang, 2003.
Nass, P.J.M., and Sukanti Suryochondro. Classic Essays on the City in Indonesia. Jakarta: Fakultas Ilmu-ilmu Sosial, Universitas Indonesia, 1978.
Salmon, Claudine. Literature in Malay by the Chinese of Indonesia: A Provisional Annotated Bibliography. Paris: : Editions de la Masion des Sciences de l’Homme, 1981.
Soei, Tio Ie. “Lie Kim Hok: 1853-1912,” dalam Kesastraan Melayu Tionghoa dan Kebangsaan Indonesia, edited by Marcus A.S. Jakarta: Gramedia, 2002.
Stevens, Th. Tarekat Mason Bebas Dan Masyarakat Di Hindia Belanda dan Indonesia 1764-1962. Edited by Pericles Kattopo. Translated. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan, 2004.
Suryadinata, Leo. Kebudayaan Minoritas Tionghoa Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramedia, 1988.
Susanto, Dwi. “Masyarakat Tionghoa Dalam Karya Sastra Peranakan Tionghoa Indonesia Pada Paruh Pertama Abad XX: Kajian Sosiologi Sastra.” Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2015.
Yu-Lan, Fung. A History of Chinese Philosophy Vol II, The Period of Classical Learning from the Second Century B.C. to the Twentieth Century A.D. Edited by Derk Bodde. Translated. Princeton: Princenton University Press, 1953.
Coppel, Charles A. “The Chinese Minority: Politics or Culture?” dalam People and Society in Indonesia A Biographical Appro¬ach, edited by Leonard Y Andaya, Charles A Coppel, and Yuji Suzuki. Victoria: Monash University, 1976.
Frost, Mark Ravinder. “Transcultural Diaspora: The Straits Chi-nese in Singapore 1819-1918.” ARI Working Paper Series. Singapore, 2003.
Salmon, Claudine. “Confucianists and Revolution in Surabaya (c. 1880-c. 1906),” dalam Chinese Indonesians Remembering Distorting, Forgetting, edited by Tim Lindsey and Helen Pausacker. Singapore: Institute of Southesat Asian Studies, 2005.
Sutrisno, Evi Lina. “Reading Lie Kim Hok’s Hikajat Khong¬hoe-tjoe: Confucianism and the Virtuous Self in Late Nineteeth Century Colonial Indonesia.” Departement Anthropology, University of Washington, 2010.
Yao, Xinzhong. An Introduction to Confucianism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

Jurnal
Ang, Ien. “On Not Speaking Chinese; Postmodern Ethnicity and the Politics of Diaspora.” New Formations 24, no. Winter (1994).
Koster, Gijs.L. “Making It New in 1884 Lie Kim Hok’s Syair Siti Akbari.” Bijdragen Tot de Taal-, Land- En Volken¬kunde 154, no. 1 (1998): 95–115. https://doi.org/10. 1163/ 22134379-90003906.
Kraus, Werner. “Chinese Influence on Early Modern Indonesia Art? Hou Qua: A Chinese Painter in 19th- Century Java.” Archipel 69, no. 1 (2005): 61–86. https://-doi.org/10.3406/arch.2005.3928.
Liu, Yujun. “Philosophies Underlying the Westren and Chinese Tradi¬¬tional Culture.” Asian Culture and History 1, no. 1 (20091): 158–60. https://doi.org/:10.5539/ach.v1n2p158.
Salmon, Claudine. “Aux Originies Du Roman Malais Moderne: Tjhit Liap Seng Ou Les ‘Pleiades’ de L.H.K.” Archipel 48, no. 1 (1994): 125–56.
Salmon, Claudine. “Le Sjair de l’ ‘Association Chinoise’ de Batavia (1905).” Archipel 2 (1971): 55–100. https://doi.org/10.34 06/arch.1971.951.
Susanto, Dwi. “Chinese Society as Depicted in Early Twentieth Century Chinese-Malay Literature.” Wacana, Journal of the Humanities of Indonesia 18, no. 1 (2017): 256–65. https://doi.org/10.17510/wacana.v18i1.580.
Tan, Chee-Ben. “Chinese Religion in Malaysia: A General View.” Asian Foklore Studies 42, no. 2 (1983): 217–52. https://doi.org/10.2307/1178483.
Zaini-Lajoubert, Monique. “Le Syair Cerita Akbari de Lie Kim Hok (1884), Un Avatar Du Syair Abdul Muluk (1864).” Archipel 48 (1994): 103–24. https://doi.org/ 10.3406/arch.1994.3005.