Paradigmatic and Syntagmatic Relations in the Qur’an: A Structural-Semiotic Reading of Qur’anic Human Creation Verses

Ubaidillah Ubaidillah; Bambang Hariyanto; Amin Nasir; Samsul Anam; Ghazali Zainuddin; Siti Rosilawati Ramlan

doi:10.31291/jlka.v24i1.1505

Authors

Ubaidillah Ubaidillah Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta
Bambang Hariyanto Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta
Amin Nasir State Islamic University Sunan Kudus, Indonesia
Samsul Anam Universitas Baturaja
Ghazali Zainuddin National University of Malaysia
Siti Rosilawati Ramlan Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31291/jlka.v24i1.1505

Keywords:

Saussure, paradigmatic relations, syntagmatic relations, human creation verses, Qur'anic linguistics

Abstract

This article examines the phases of human creation in the Qur'an through Ferdinand de Saussure's structural linguistic framework, with particular attention to paradigmatic (lexical selection) and syntagmatic (sequential arrangement) relations operative in key verses: QS al-Mu'minūn [23]:12–14, al-Ḥajj [22]:5, as-Sajdah [32]:7–9, and al-Insān [76]:2. Employing a qualitative descriptive method with content analysis, the study draws on primary data comprising Qur'anic texts and secondary data from classical and contemporary exegetical works. The analysis demonstrates that lexical variations, including ṭīn (clay), turāb (soil), sulālah (essence of earth), and nuṭfah (seminal fluid), constitute a system of paradigmatic oppositions that encodes a graduated ontological progression from material origin to spiritual endowment. Syntagmatic relations, realized through conjunctions such as ṡumma and fa, organize these stages into a coherent narrative sequence that moves from physical formation to the bestowal of cognitive and spiritual faculties. Accordingly, the language of the Qur'an functions not merely to describe biological processes but to construct a conceptual framework through which human identity, origin, and existential purpose are discursively represented. This study concludes that the Qur'anic linguistic structure constitutes a theologically organized semiotic system in which lexical selection and syntagmatic patterning jointly produce a layered discourse of human existence — one that integrates the material, biological, spiritual, and cognitive dimensions of personhood within a unified sign system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Books

Al-Qurṭubī, Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. Al-Jāmiʿ li Aḥkām al-Qur’ān. Edited by Aḥmad al-Bardūnī and Ibrāhīm Aṭfīsh. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 2006.

Aṭ-Ṭabarī, Muḥammad ibn Jarīr. Tafsīr Aṭ-Ṭabarī: Jāmiʿ al-Bayān ʿan Ta’wīl Āyi al-Qur’ān. Critical ed. Cairo: Dār al-Fikr, 2022.

Ibn Kathīr, Ismāʿīl. Tafsīr al-Qur’ān al-ʿAẓīm. 10 vols. Riyadh: Dār al-Salām, 2023.

Pickthall, Marmaduke William. The Meaning of the Glorious Qur’an: An Explanatory Translation. Revised ed. London: IDCI, 2011.

Saussure, Ferdinand de. Course in General Linguistics. Edited by Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye. Translated by Wade Baskin. New York: Philosophical Library, 1959.

Shihab, M. Quraish. Al-Lubab: Makna, Tujuan, dan Pelajaran dari Surah-Surah Al-Qur’an. Tangerang: Lentera Hati, 2012.

Shihab, M. Quraish. Tafsir Al-Mishbah: Pesan, Kesan, dan Keserasian Al-Qur’an. Vol. 9. Jakarta: Lentera Hati, 2002.

Ubaidillah. Aliran-Aliran Linguistik Era Tradisional Hingga Kontemporer: Sejarah, Tokoh, dan Teori. Bone: Alinea Indonesia, 2026.

Ubaidillah. Teori-Teori Linguistik. Yogyakarta: Prodi Sastra Inggris, Fakultas Adab dan Ilmu Budaya, UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, 2021.

Book Chapter

Révész, Andrea. “Coding Second Language Data Validly and Reliably.” In Current Approaches in Second Language Acquisition Research, 257–75. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394259670.ch12.

Journal Articles

Agustina, Fitri Dwi, and M. Nurul Huda. “Perspective Al-Qur’an and Biology in Human Creation.” Journal Intellectual Sufism Research (JISR) 3, no. 1 (2020): 68–76. https://doi.org/10.52032/jisr.v3i1.91.

Akzam, Ismail, and Solehah Yaacob. “Grammatical Issues in the Holy Qur’an about Human Creation.” Al-Hikmah: Jurnal Agama dan Ilmu Pengetahuan 21, no. 1 (2024): 108–22. https://doi.org/10.25299/al-hikmah:jaip.2024.vol21(1).15854.

Al-Baydhani, Abd-Gawaad Abd Al-Hassan Ali. “The Letter (Thuma) between Neglect and Realization: An Analytical Study of Its Occurrence in the Glorious Qur’an.” International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education 14, no. 1 (2022): 732–37. https://doi.org/10.9756/int-jecse/v14i1.221086.

Alshbeil, Abeer. “Conjunctions Letters on Soura (AL Kahf) of the Holy Quran, the Conjunction Letters Was: (Wa, Fa, Aw).” Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences 50, no. 1 (2023): 405–14. https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v50i1.4423.

Alwan, Salam Khaleel. “The Qur’anic ‘Thumma’: A Genealogical Study.” Mağallaẗ Buḥūṯ Al-Luġaẗ 4, no. 2 (2023): 102–19. https://doi.org/10.25130/jls.4.2.9.

Andani, Khalil. “Evolving Creation: An Ismaili Muslim Interpretation of Evolution.” Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 57, no. 2 (2022): 443–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12774.

Chatzichristos, Georgios. “Qualitative Research in the Era of AI: A Return to Positivism or a New Paradigm?” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 24, no. 1 (2025): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251337583.

Daneshgar, Majid. “The Qurʾān and Science, Part III: Makers of the Scientific Miraculousness.” Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 58, no. 4 (2023): 1005–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12930.

Farahmand, Maryam, Mostafa Taqavi, and Ali Asghar Ahmadi. “Iranian Scholars’ Contemporary Debate between Evolutionary Human Genesis and Readings of the Qur’an: Perspectives and Classification.” Religions 14, no. 2 (2023): 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14020143.

Gretschel, Pam, Elelwani Ramugondo, and Roshan Galvaan. “Linking Paradigms and Methodologies in a Qualitative Case Study Focused on Exploring the Operation of Power in Human Actions During the Design of a New Occupational Therapy Intervention.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 22, no. 1 (2023): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231187590.

Houser, Nathan. “Semiotics and Philosophy.” The American Journal of Semiotics 36, no. 1 (2020): 135–64. https://doi.org/10.5840/ajs202082764.

Inloes, Amina. “Other ‘Adams’: Twelver Shiʿism and Human Evolution.” Theology and Science 21, no. 4 (2023): 708–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2023.2255953.

Joseph, John E. “Saussure’s Dichotomies and the Shapes of Structuralist Semiotics.” Sign Systems Studies 50, no. 1 (2022): 11–37. https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2022.50.1.02.

Kamil, Sukron, and Rizqi Handayani. “Semiotika Struktural sebagai Standar Tafsir Teks Islam.” Jurnal Lektur Keagamaan 21, no. 2 (2023): 493–526. https://doi.org/10.31291/jlka.v21i2.1129.

Khairifa, Feni, Endrise Septina Rawanoko, and Indira Fatra Deni Peranginangin. “The Dilemma of Human Cloning in Islamic Theology: A Critique of the Uniqueness of Human Creation and Implications for Maqashid Al-Shariah.” Pharos Journal of Theology 106, no. 3 (2025): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.106.303.

Khiveh, Fatemeh, Omid Asemani, Sedigheh Ebrahimi, Seyed Ziaeddin Tabei, and Sekaleshfar Farokh Bahram. “The Modalization and Evolution of Human Intellect (Cognitive Systems): Following in the Prophets’ Footsteps.” Maqolat 3, no. 2 (2025): 180–94. https://doi.org/10.58355/maqolat.v3i2.142.

Luskin, Casey. “Comparing Contemporary Evangelical Models Regarding Human Origins.” Religions 14, no. 6 (2023): 748. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14060748.

Malik, Shoaib Ahmed. “The Use of Philosophy of Science in the Creationism-Evolution Debate: An Ashʿarī Perspective.” Theology and Science 21, no. 3 (2023): 421–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2023.2230430.

Muhibah, Alya, et al. “The Creation of Man in Tafsir Al-Jawahir by Thanthawi Jawhar.” Al-Afkar: Journal for Islamic Studies 8, no. 3 (2025): 2069–84. https://doi.org/10.31943/afkarjournal.v8i3.1656.

Rassool, G. H., and Zuleyha Keskin. “Positioning the Self (Nafs) in Islamic Psycho-Spirituality.” Journal of Spirituality in Mental Health 27, no. 1 (2023): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/19349637.2023.2264848.

Rohanimashhadi, Farzaneh. “‘Adam’s Istifā’ in Qur’an and Human Evolution.” HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies 76, no. 1 (2020): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v76i1.5795.

Saifuddin, Hadid Humaid, Muhammad Fikri Ibrahim, Yana Permana, and Muhammad Agus Yusron. “Creation of Human in Qur’an.” Journal of Ulumul Qur’an and Tafsir Studies 2, no. 1 (2023): 19–24. https://doi.org/10.54801/juquts.v2i1.171.

Salam, Kemal Bagja, Muhamad Hafidz Usman, Rega Abun Nasheer, Ali Fathurabani, and Muhammad Baasil Wafdulloh. “Phases of Human Creation from the Scientific Interpretation Perspective of the Ministry of Religion of the Republic of Indonesia.” Journal of Ulumul Qur’an and Tafsir Studies 3, no. 2 (2024): 47–54. https://doi.org/10.54801/juquts.v3i1.271.

Swamidass, S. Joshua. “Advancing Evolutionary Science in Dialogue with Islam.” Theology and Science 21, no. 4 (2023): 642–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2023.2255949.

Wible, David, and Nai-Lung Tsao. “Constructions and the Problem of Discovery: A Case for the Paradigmatic.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 16, no. 1 (2020): 67–93. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2017-0008.

Proceedings

Hadi, Robi Sofian, et al. “The Concept of Human Nature from the Perspective of Imam Al-Qurthubi in Tafsir Al-Jami’ Li Ahkam Al-Qur’an: Study of Analysis of Q.S. Ar-Rum Verse 30.” In Proceeding International Conference on Islam, Law, and Society (INCOILS), vol. 4. 2025. https://doi.org/10.70062/incoils.v4i1.227.